Help to Buy ISA bad idea

UK gets its tax incentives in a muddle

Image
George Hay
Last Updated : Mar 19 2015 | 10:08 PM IST
George Osborne has served up another helping of muddled tax incentives. Outside observers of the UK might assume that the Chancellor of the Exchequer would want to arrange his system of levies and duties to ease two big policy problems - house-price affordability and the lack of bank lending. Measures announced on March 18 will do the opposite.

If the government really wanted to deal with spiralling property prices, it would build a lot more houses. Osborne's "Help to Buy" scheme has always taken the opposite, more dubious approach: giving first-time buyers the wherewithal to borrow more by guaranteeing mortgages backed by a sliver of equity. Now he is going one step further: the state will allow first-time buyers to receive £3,000 from the state if they save up a deposit of £12,000.

Against the UK's £1.7-trillion economy, the £835 million this is projected to cost by 2020 isn't much. Nor is it certain to have a huge effect: potential buyers can save only £200 a month, so it would take them over four years to attain the maximum entitlement. Still, it constitutes a transfer of value from taxpayers in general to homebuyers in particular, who may in turn only bid up prices to the benefit of existing property owners. This is money that would have been much better spent on new housing supply.

Meanwhile, banks have cause to feel aggrieved. When the UK bank levy was introduced in the wake of the financial crisis, charging a fee based on the size of lenders' balance sheets incentivised much-needed deleveraging. The levy's higher rate on riskier short-term wholesale funding made the system safer. But Osborne has now hiked the rate for an eighth time. The rate is now being set to raise a sum, rather than encourage prudent behaviour. Such a policy now just eats into banks' already meagre returns, and hence their ability to bolster capital and lend more.

Not all Osborne's tax tinkering is bad - slashing rates for the hobbled oil and gas sector is logical help for an industry going through a difficult phase. Reducing tax on savings interest sends out the right message when the UK needs to boost its savings rate. But a distortion of the housing market and bank balance sheets suggest a win for politics over prudence.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 19 2015 | 9:31 PM IST

Next Story