But we should hold the celebrations. First, there is a message in the failure of State Bank of India's share issue this week. Though the asking price was modest, less than $250 million came from abroad, for an issue size that was intended to be over $1.5 billion. If the whole thing was not a fiasco, it was only because domestic public sector entities (banks and insurance) bailed in - and you can guess whether they were following orders. Bear in mind that bad and restructured loans could eventually wipe out the existing share capital of India's government-owned banks, and they will need many billions of dollars of fresh capital (read last week's Ruminations: "Money in those vaults"). But if the largest and best of the pack can't generate foreign investor interest, what are the others going to do? Fall back on taxpayer money at a time of fiscal stress? A financial sector that is short of capital cannot meet the economy's credit needs, and will constrict growth. The reform of government-run banks has become essential and urgent.
Second, there is the business of government expenditure. At over seven per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), the fiscal deficit (for Centre plus states) is by far the largest among emerging markets. The outlook is that things may get worse, as state after state rolls back power tariffs, the cooking gas subsidy is increased, and road tolls are attacked. There seems to be an all-party consensus on more government giveaways, and implicitly therefore against fiscal correction. That this translates into higher inflation and macroeconomic instability seems beyond the ken of everyone from Arvind Kejriwal and Rahul Gandhi to Raj Thackeray. Mr Chidambaram may do everything possible to keep this year's deficit down to the target of 4.8 per cent of GDP, but something that is artificially compressed by a determined minister is likely to balloon next year.
Finally, there is the business of improving governance. Aadhaar was to have been a game-changer but has been sacrificed at the altar of expediency. If unique identity numbers are not to be used for enabling cash transfers, as a superior alternative to product subsidies that are poorly targeted and prone to large leakages (and cooking gas is a prime example), what is the justification for spending many thousands of crores on Aadhaar? Talk of lack of conviction in reform! India has escaped contagion for now, but the world's economic troubles are far from over. The anti-reform consensus could yet undo our future.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
