HC curbs on media reporting allegations against ex-SC judge

The interim order also asked media not to carry photographs of Justice Swatanter Kumar

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 16 2014 | 4:05 PM IST
In a relief to former Supreme Court judge Justice Swatanter Kumar, the Delhi High Court today restrained the media from publishing and telecasting the contents of the law intern's complaint of sexual harassment against him.

Ordering deletion of alleged defamatory parts of the news items and the photograph of Justice Kumar within 24 hours, Justice Manmohan Singh, in his interim order, also asked the media not to carry the photographs of Justice Kumar, who is also the National Green Tribunal Chairperson in their future news reports.

"The defendants No. 1 to 5 (media houses and the law intern) are further restrained from telecasting and printing the photograph of the plaintiff (Justice Kumar)," the judge said while pronouncing the order in a packed court room.

The court also made it clear that its order will remain effective till February 24, the next date of hearing, and issued notices to the woman intern, two English news channels, and a leading English daily.

The court had earlier reserved its interim order on the plea of Justice Kumar seeking to restrain media from reporting, publishing or telecasting news relating to the law intern's complaint against the judge, saying only court proceedings can be reported "nothing more, nothing less".

The plea had also sought a ban on repeat of the television programmes on the subject.

Justice Kumar has also demanded Rs five crore as damages from the law intern, who made the allegation against him, and three media groups that publicised her complaint.

Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the former judge, had said Justice Kumar has an "illustrious career spanning 43 years in the legal field as a lawyer and as a high court and the Supreme Court Judge and more over, his fundamental right of good name and reputation cannot be allowed to be blackened by the media."

The petition has also said, "pass a decree for damages in favour of the plaintiff and against defendant no- 1 to 5 jointly and severally at least for an amount of Rs five crores only or for any higher amounts as this court may be pleased to determine...".
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 16 2014 | 3:41 PM IST

Next Story