"An FIR was lodged against DU Professor Nandini Sundar, Archana Prasad (JNU Professor), Vineet Tiwari (from Delhi's Joshi Adhikar Sansthan), Sanjay Parate(Chhattisgarh CPI (Marxist) State Secretary) and others along with Maoists for the murder of Shamnath Baghel based on the complaint of his wife on Saturday," Inspector General of Police of Chattisgarh's Bastar Range) S R P Kalluri told PTI today.
They were booked under sections 120-B (criminal conspiracy), 302 (murder), 147 (rioting), 148 and 149 of IPC at Tongpal police station, Kalluri said adding, "strongest possible action will be taken against those guilty after the investigation".
Both Sundar and Prasad rejected the charges against them, claiming they have been framed. Parate has accused the police of falsely implicating him and other activists in the case.
Armed Naxals had allegedly killed Baghel with sharp weapons on Friday late night (November 4) at his residence in Nama village under Kumakoleng gram panchayat in Tongpal area, around 450 km away from Raipur.
Baghel and some of his associates were spearheading the protest against Naxal activities in their village since April this year.
"As per the complaint lodged by the victim's wife, her husband had been getting threats from Maoists since he and other villagers had complained against Sundar in May this year. Even armed ultras were referring to that complaint and anti-Maoist demonstrations while attacking Baghel on Friday," the IG said.
Baghel's wife has sought action against Sundar and others accusing them of murdering her husband, Kalluri said.
Sundar strongly rubbished allegations of the police linking her to the murder while a number of civil rights bodies called the charges a tactic of "revenge and harassment".
She said it was a clear case of being "framed" and that police have been forcing some people in Bastar to name her and others in someway. "The FIR is patently absurd," she told PTI from the US.
Prasad, a professor of Jawaharlal Nehru University(JNU), said the charges are false but not surprising.
"This false case has not come as a surprise to us considering the character of the government where activists are repetitively hounded. When media criticises them they ban the organisation, when individuals criticise them they charge them for sedition and when activists criticise them they target them selectively.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
