Accused into transfer-postings: MP honeytrap case charge sheet

Image
Press Trust of India Indore
Last Updated : Dec 16 2019 | 8:55 PM IST

A 400-page charge sheet was filed on Monday in the honeytrap and blackmail case busted in Indore and Bhopal in Madhya Pradesh in September this year.

The honey-trapping racket was revealed after IMC superintendent engineer Harbhajan Singh approached police claiming he was being blackmailed to the tune of Rs 3 crore over objectionable video clips.

Five women and a man, identified as Aarti Dayal (29), Monica Yadav (18), Shweta Vijay Jain (39), Shweta Swapnil Jain (48), Barkha Soni (34) and Omprakash Kori (45), were arrested in Indore and Bhopal on September 18-19 for allegedly running the racket.

The charge sheet was filed in the court of Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) Amit Kumar Gupta against the six persons who have been charged under sections 120-B (criminal conspiracy), 370 (human trafficking), 385 (intimidating a person to extort ransom) and others of Indian Penal Code and provisions of Information Technology Act, said District Public Prosecution Officer Mohammad Akram Sheikh.

The charge sheet stated the organised gang involved in this case used girls, brought to Bhopal through human trafficking, to honeytrap rich and influential people through objectionable videos of their intimate moments, screenshots of social media chats etc.

It said the gang was also involved in the transfer and posting of the government officials by threatening influential people, earning money in the process.

The police had seized documents and private diary from the premises of Aarti Dayal (29), one of the accused, in which the details of the amounts made from blackmailing has been recorded in code.

These documents also mention transfers, appointments and contracts etc related to government departments.

However, no name other than that of the complainant, an official of Indore Municipal Corporation (IMC), has been mentioned in the charge sheet.

"Investigation is underway to identify the individuals who have been blackmailed on the basis of their intimate video, audio and social media chats and to know about their (suspected) criminal role in the case.

"The inquiry is still pending to know if such persons were public servants and misused their position in any way to provide benefits to the accused," the charge sheet said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 16 2019 | 8:55 PM IST

Next Story