A group of activists has appealed to DCW chief Swati Maliwal to end her hunger strike and reconsider her demand for capital punishment for rape of minors, saying there is no evidence to suggest that the death penalty acts as a deterrent.
In an open letter to Maliwal, who has been fasting for the last nine days, the activists said they were deeply troubled by her demand for death penalty for rape of minors and noted that in her capacity as the chair of a statutory body, it is essential that she understands and engages with the in-principle opposition that many representatives of the women's movement have against death penalty.
"The issue of your demand for death penalty for rapists of minors that is being sought to be addressed by you is compelling us to raise some fundamental issues and concerns.
"There is no evidence to suggest that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to rape. The most important factor that can act as a deterrent is the certainty of punishment, rather than the severity of its form," the activists said in the letter.
In fact, the demand for death penalty often takes the attention away from the gravity of the real issue, that of ensuring that institutions charged with responsibility to end violence, undertake systemic reforms and measures to dismantle patriarchal social norms that result in gender and other forms of inequalities, they said.
"As we know, in cases of sexual violence where the perpetrator is in a position of power conviction is notoriously difficult. The death penalty, for reasons that have already been mentioned, would make conviction next to impossible," they said.
The activists demanded that focus remains on ensuring the certainty and swiftness of punishment rather than the severity of punishment.
"Given the fact that death penalty is an issue that is informed by a core ethical persuasion that each individual comes with, we also appeal to you not to impose this as the key solution to sexual violence on minors on all partnering civil society organizations and individuals.
"This militates against the basic tenet of right to individual and collective freedom of thought as well as freedom to uphold one's conscience and personal ethics. We request you to review and reflect upon your position on this issue and to end your indefinite hunger strike at the earliest," they said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
