Bar bribery case: HC nod for further probe against Mani

Image
Press Trust of India Kochi
Last Updated : Nov 09 2015 | 5:42 PM IST
In more trouble for Kerala Finance Minister K M Mani, the High Court today cleared the decks for further investigation against him in the bar bribery case, observing that common man should not feel that no probe is conducted when the accused is a minister.
Upholding the order of Vigilance Court for further probe, the court said, "Caesar's wife must be above suspicion". An FIR has been filed in the case against Mani.
Justice B Kemal Pasha, while passing the order on a petition by Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau seeking a stay on the Vigilance Court order for further probe, observed that "common man cannot have a feeling that no investigation has been conducted when the accused is a minister".
The court also wanted to know why the government was "worried" about the investigation when the matter concerned was about public money. "Common man should have faith in the system," it said.
The verdict, dictated in an open court, also witnessed dramatic moments when Justice Pasha remarked that "there were circumstances leading to show that there was payment of illegal gratification".
At this juncture, senior Congress leader and former Union Minister Kapil Sibal, representing the Vigilancem department, and State Advocate General K P Dandapani, stood up and strongly opposed the remark after which the references were deleted from the final order.
The proceedings, which began at 10.15 am, continued till 2 pm without lunch break.
The court also expunged certain adverse remarks against Vigilance Director Vinson M Paul made by the special court.
While accepting that the Director had certain powers to supervise the probe, the judge came down on the official saying he seems to have acted solely on the basis of legal opinion received from the two Supreme Court lawyers.
"The Vigilance Director did not examine materials and evidences collected by the investigating officer. On the other hand, the Director relied on legal advice", the Court said. Vigilance Director had the power to order further probe which he did not exercise, the court noted.
The Vigilance Court in Thiruvananthapuram had on October 29 while ordering further probe into the bar bribery case against Mani, observed that there are "sufficient materials for making out a prima facie case".
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 09 2015 | 5:42 PM IST

Next Story