"They (BJP government at the centre) cannot abrogate Article 370 till the Constituent Assembly is recalled. The Constituent Assembly approved accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India. If you want to raise the question once again, then you need to bring the Constituent Assembly and then we will talk," Omar told reports here.
The chief minister was speaking as the row over the remarks of Minister of State in the PMO Jitendra Singh's that efforts will be made to "convince" the "unconvinced" on abrogation of Article 370 continued to rage.
Omar said the Centre should strengthen its relationship with the state, but such a move will further alienate the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
"You want to strengthen the State-Centre relationship but this is not the way. This will further widen the gap between the people of the state and the rest of the country which you will understand very soon. I can understand the political compulsion of the BJP, but first focus on other promises. The first attack is on Jammu and Kashmir," he said.
The chief minister said confusion was deliberately created among the people in the country over Article 370 and the state subject laws in the state.
"Confusion is being created deliberately over state subject law and the Article 370 of the Constitution. The Article 370 has nothing to do with the purchase of property here.
"Before the Article 370, the state subject laws were enforced in the state by the Maharaja to save the people of Jammu who were apprehensive that rich Punjabis will come and buy their land.
"If you see today, God forbid, if you play with our state subject laws, then even in such a situation nobody will come to Kashmir. If the land is purchased or anything of the kind happens, it will be happen in Jammu region," he said.
Omar dismissed the assertion that the state subject laws were a hindrance in the development of the state.
"The state subject laws protect our people. How are they a hindrance in the development of the state? If the state lacked in development it was because of the prevailing situation. Before (the eruption of militancy in) 1989, nobody complained of such a thing. Factories were being set up everywhere but nobody questioned the state subject laws.
"This is not the only state in the country where this law is in force. There are other states where such laws are prevalent but nobody talks about them," he said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app