Cal HC happy that Supreme Court would be looking into tussle

Image
Press Trust of India Kolkata
Last Updated : Jun 26 2013 | 5:55 PM IST
The Calcutta High Court today expressed happiness that the legal tussle between the West Bengal government and the State Election Commission (SEC) has gone to the Supreme Court and said it was fed up with the case.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Joymalyo Bagchi, which has been hearing the case between the government and the SEC over holding of panchayat elections in the state, said "entire India is looking at this case.
"We are happy that it has gone to the Supreme Court. At least there will some verdict now. We are fed up with the case," the Chief Justice said even as the there was a war of words between the counsels of the government and the SEC and its petition in the apex court during pendency of the case in the high court.
Urging the senior counsels to stop their verbal duel, the Chief Justice said "enough is enough for this court."
The bench directed that the matter be listed on Friday and that it would be taken up after the matter before the Supreme Court was over and decided.
The Chief Justice had earlier also expressed his displeasure at the continuous tussle between the two constitutional bodies and had several times urged both parties to sit across the table to resolve the issues.
Following differences between the state government and the SEC, the latter went to court seeking a three-phase election and 800 companies of central forces.
A single bench of the high court allowed the petition of the SEC, which was challenged by the state government in the division bench.
The bench upheld the decision of conducting the election in three phases, but directed that it would be the state's prerogative to arrange forces from either the Centre or from other states.
It also clarified its order later upholding the supremacy of the SEC in holding the panchayat polls.
The bench had said that while the SEC would decide on the requirement of forces for the polls, the state would make the arrangements and it would be its prerogative from where it would procure forces, the Centre or other states.
The state had written to three states for forces but did not get a favourable response, following which it asked the Centre to provide 300 companies of central armed police.
The Centre, however, expressed its inability to provide any forces.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 26 2013 | 5:55 PM IST

Next Story