Section 375 (rape) of IPC has an exception clause which says "sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under fifteen years of age, is not rape."
Section 5 (n) of POCSO says that sexual intercourse with a child below 18 years is an "aggravated penetrative sexual assault" inviting penal consequences.
The bench also comprising Justices N V Ramana and D Y Chandrachud asked the Ministry of Women and Child Development to consider the representation of the NGO, examine it and file the detailed report on the issue.
"If you are still unhappy with the response, you are at liberty to approach the court," the bench said.
Section 6 of POCSO Act provides punishment of rigorous imprisonment not less than 10 years to life imprisonment for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child below 18 years of age.
Satyarthi's NGO said that the provisions makes it clear
that where a child is below the age of 18, even if she is a wife and is subjected to sexual intercourse by her husband, the provisions of POCSO will apply, and the same will constitute aggravated penetrative sexual assault.
"In a large number of cases, the petitioner has observed that despite being a child by definition (under the age of 18), provisions of POCSO are not being applied and the benefit of a special act is not being afforded to children where they are in married relationship but over the age of fifteen.
The NGO also sought rehabilitation of under the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act whose marriage has been declared void/voidable under the provisions of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.
It also sought a direction to the Centre to formulate a national action plan with detailed roles, responsibilities and accountability of the various government departments to ensure the protection of the girl child from the menace of child marriage.
