CCI warns Karnataka chemists and druggists association

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 03 2017 | 9:28 PM IST
The Competition Commission has directed the Karnataka Chemists and Druggists Association, which was penalised recently for unfair business practices, to "cease and desist" from such activities.
The latest directive has come in a case where the association was found to have violated competition norms with respect to the practice of issuance of no objection certificate for appointment of stockists.
The complaint by Belgaum District Chemists and Druggists Association (BCDA) was filed against KCDA as well as Abbott India, Geno Pharmaceuticals and All India Organisation of Chemists And Druggists (AIOCD).
It was alleged that Abbott India and Geno Pharmaceuticals refused to supply drugs to the members of BCDA as they did not have No Objection Certificates from KCDA or AIOCD.
In its order, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) said the practice of mandating NOC as a pre-requisite for appointment of stockists amounts to limiting and restricting the supply of pharmaceutical drugs in the market, in violation of competition norms.
The determination of trade margins for wholesalers and retailers by KCDA "is in contravention" of the provisions of Section 3 of the Competition Act, the regulator noted.
Section 3 pertains to anti-competitive agreements.
The watchdog has asked the association to cease and desist from unfair business practices.
"Commission directs OP 2 (KCDA) to cease and desist from indulging in the practice of mandating No Objection Certificate as a pre-requisite for appointment of stockist and fixing of trade margins for retailers and wholesalers, which have been held to be anti-competitive...," it said in an order issued on Thursday.
However, the watchdog has decided not to penalise KCDA since a monetary fine had already been imposed on it in an earlier matter involving similar allegations.
"Recently a penalty of Rs 8,60,321 was imposed upon OP 2 in a matter involving similar allegations i.E. NOC practice for appointment of stockist. The period of contravention in the said case was subsequent to the period of investigation in the instant matter.
"In view of these, the Commission refrains from imposing any monetary penalty in the present case," the order said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 03 2017 | 9:28 PM IST

Next Story