Coal scam: CBI asked to reply on accused' plea to inspect docs

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 06 2015 | 8:07 PM IST
A special court today directed the CBI to furnish a detailed reply before it about the documents, which were sought to be inspected by two accused in a coal scam case, and specify whether they were relevant to the case.
Special CBI Judge Bharat Parashar asked the agency to give specific averments regarding these documents and their relevance to the case.
"You give a categorical statement about these documents. Give a point-wise reply and make specific averments in it. You clarify if these documents are relevant to the case or not," the judge told senior public prosecutor A P Singh.
The case pertains to alleged irregularities in allocation of Rampia and dip side of Rampia coal block in Odisha to M/s Navbharat Power Pvt Ltd (NPPL), now known as Brahmani Thermal Power Pvt Ltd (BTPPL), in January 2008.
During the hearing, the court asked the agency to confine its reply only to the aspect of inspection of these documents by the two accused, BTPPL's Chairman P Trivikrama Prasad and its Vice-Chairman Y Harish Chandra Prasad.
Both the accused have moved application seeking to inspect various coal scam related documents which are in CBI's possession.
"The issue is that they (accused) want to inspect these documents. You confine your response to this aspect only. If accused will say that they want copies of these documents then I will see later whether these documents can be supplied to them," the judge said.
"Senior public prosecutor has been told to furnish a detailed response as to the documents whose inspection has been sought for by the accused persons," the court noted in its order and fixed the matter for hearing on November 26.
Besides Trivikrama Prasad and Harish Chandra Prasad, former Coal Secretary H C Gupta, two senior public servants, K S Kropha and K C Samria, are accused in the case along with the firm. These accused are now out on bail.
The court had summoned them for alleged offences under sections 120-B (criminal conspiracy), 409 (criminal breach of trust by public servants) and 420 (cheating) of IPC and under Prevention of Corruption Act.
CBI had earlier filed a charge sheet against NPPL, Trivikrama Prasad and Harish Chandra Prasad for alleged criminal conspiracy and cheating under IPC and said in its final report that no offence was found to have been committed by the public servants.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 06 2015 | 8:07 PM IST

Next Story