Coalscam: Court rejects plea to summon ex-PM as defence witness

The court said that the application was 'vexatious' and it was apparently moved to delay the trial

Manmohan Singh & Sonia Gandhi. File photo
Manmohan Singh & Sonia Gandhi
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 23 2015 | 6:53 PM IST
A special court today dismissed the plea of an accused seeking to summon former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as defence witness in a coal scam case, saying the application was "vexatious" and it was apparently moved to delay the trial.

The court also rejected the plea of Jharkhand Ispat Pvt Ltd (JIPL) Director, R S Rungta, seeking to summon ex-Minister of State for Coal, Dasari Narayan Rao, as a witness in his defence in the case pertaining to alleged irregularities in allocation of North Dhadu coal block in Jharkhand to the firm.

Special CBI Judge Bharat Parashar said that the grounds mentioned in Rungta's plea for summoning these two as defence witnesses was "completely irrelevant and unwarranted".

ALSO READ: Coal scam: Court reserves order on plea to call ex-PM as witness


"In view of my aforesaid discussion, I accordingly dismiss the present application in so far as the summoning of two proposed witnesses namely Dasari Narayan Rao, the then Minister of State for Coal and Manmohan Singh, the then Prime Minister/Minister of Coal, is concerned being vexatious and having been moved to delay and to defeat the ends of justice," the judge said in his 23-page order.

The court further noted, "thus, once again it is crystal clear that summoning of the two proposed witnesses by accused R S Rungta for the grounds as mentioned in the application is not only completely irrelevant and unwarranted but the application has been apparently moved for the purposes of causing delay so as to defeat the ends of justice and is vexatious in nature."

It said that from perusal of nature of charges framed against the accused in the case, it was clear that proceedings which took place in the Ministry of Steel and the Ministry of Coal, including two screening committee meetings, was of no relevance to the matter.

However, the court said record reflecting constitution of members of screening committee relevant to the 27th and 30th meeting and the record of policy decision for allocation of coal block by joint venture/consortium could be permitted to be placed on record as urged by the accused in the plea.

"Accordingly, prosecution (CBI) is directed to intimate the authority with whom the said record as stated by them in their reply is stated to be available. Thereafter, the said record can be permitted to be placed on record," the court said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 23 2015 | 5:42 PM IST

Next Story