Committed to enabling access to learning materials: Publishers after HC decision

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 09 2016 | 9:22 PM IST
Global publishing houses like Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press and Taylor & Francis today said they are fully committed to the ongoing creation of high quality knowledge and learning materials across all disciplines and subjects.
The publishers earlier in the day got partial relief from the Delhi High Court which restored their lawsuit which was dismissed by a single judge.
A division bench of justices Pradeep Nandrajog and Yogesh Khanna setting aside part of the September 16 judgement of the single judge, who had allowed sale of photocopies of textbooks by saying there was "no triable issue" arising out of the dispute.
In a joint statement after the high court decision, the publishers said they are also committed to finding ways to enable students and researchers around the world to access these materials on an equitable basis.
"We believe that such access can only be ensured on a long term and sustainable basis with the support of a fair and balanced framework of reciprocal rights and obligations that enables all those involved in the provision of learning and communication of scholarly research to be acknowledged for the contribution they have made.
"Through this appeal, we had sought to clarify that Indian copyright law did indeed support such a framework, and in so doing balance the interests of those creating learning materials here in India, with those requiring access to them in a fair and sustainable manner," it said.
The publishers said they will consider this judgement in more detail over the coming days.
"In the meantime, we wish to reiterate that all publishers continue to work on models that will enable equitable access to knowledge," they said.
The publishers had approached the division bench against the single judge order which had allowed the shop, Rameshwari photocopy services, to sell photocopies of their textbooks saying copyright in literary works does not confer "absolute ownership" to the authors.
Rameshwari photocopy service runs a shop in the precincts of Delhi School of Economics in the Delhi University campus.
The publishers had argued before the bench that sale of photocopies of books published by them affected their market share and it was infringing upon their copyright over the text books.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 09 2016 | 9:22 PM IST

Next Story