Del govt fails to get matters on its powers jointly listed in SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 04 2016 | 9:13 PM IST
Aam Aadmi Party government today made frantic but unsuccessful efforts before the Supreme Court to ensure that its lawsuit for declaration of powers of Delhi as a state be heard along with its plea to restrain Delhi High Court from delivering verdict on a host of issues, including the scope of its powers.
The first effort was made before a bench comprising Justices J S Khehar and Arun Mishra. Since Justice Khehar recused from hearing the plea for passing an order to restrain the High Court from delivering the verdict on scope of powers of Delhi Government which still did not enjoy full statehood under the Constitution, the bench declined to go into the second plea of the lawsuit.
"It is not for us to say anything on the separate lawsuit you have filed. We are not dealing with the matter. It means we are not going to say anything," the bench said, when senior advocate Indira Jaising urged that there should be an order that both the matters be listed for hearing before an appropriate bench tomorrow itself.
Her plea was also objected to by Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, who said he was not giving his consent for listing both matters together as there was a proper procedure for it which the Delhi Government must follow.
He said such a plea can be mentioned before the Chief Justice who was still holding the hearing at the time.
Jaising then entered into a minor spat with Rohatgi over the procedure for seeking hearing of Delhi government petition on Tuesday and said he cannot backtrack from his consent given earlier.
"I can't expect an attorney general to behave like this," she said.
Rohatgi said he also did no expect a senior lawyer like her not following the procedure of the court.
To this, Justice Khehar in a lighter vain said "Mr. Attorney General, you cannot withdraw your consent given to a woman."
Rohatgi said it was not about withdrawing consent, but the procedure which needs to be followed.
After the hearing was over before the bench of Justice Khehar, Jaising along with a team of lawyer rushed before the bench headed by CJI and just before it was to rise for lunch, she made the second attempt on behalf of the Delhi Government.
However, Justice Thakur along with Justice D Y Chandrachud, also declined the plea saying "the suit has nothing to do with the matter (which was listed today)".
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 04 2016 | 9:13 PM IST

Next Story