Don't reject mediclaims on whimsical grounds: Consumer forum

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 25 2016 | 2:42 PM IST
A consumer forum here has asked insurance companies not to reject claims on "whimsical and technical grounds" as people buy mediclaims to cover medical exigencies.
"Consumers purchase mediclaim policies to cover medical emergencies and exigencies and the insurance company should not reject claims on whimsical and technical grounds," the North Delhi District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum said.
The forum, headed by its President K S Mohi, directed the Oriental Insurance Co Ltd to pay Rs 90,879 along with a sum of Rs 10,000, to Saket resident Keshav Saran Sharma, holding that the company had rejected his claims on frivolous grounds.
It rejected the company's claim that the patient's insurance cover had expired and held that there was no delay in renewal of the policy.
"In this case, there is not even a single hour break in the 2nd policy. Therefore, taking into view the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and especially the fact that the patient was discharged on January 30, 2012 i.E. Well within the currency of the insurance policy, the repudiation by the insurance company was illegal and unjustified," it said.
In his complaint, Sharma had said he taken a mediclaim policy valid from January 27, 2011, till midnight of January 26, 2012, and the sum insured was Rs 2,50,000.
He said that his wife was admitted for treatment of breast cancer on January 26, 2012 at Max Super Specialty Hospital in Saket and discharged within four days.
Sharma had also claimed that the premium for renewal of policy was paid on January 23, 2012 but the insurance company renewed the policy by maintaining the continuity from 00.00 hours January 27, 2012 till midnight of January 26, 2013.
The insurance company rejected the claim of Sharma saying that the patient was admitted on January 26, 2012, which was the date of expiry of the policy.
The forum observed that the company had collected the premium cheque dated January 23, 2012, much before the date of policy renewal.
"This policy also shows that the premium cheque dated January 23, 2012 for a sum of Rs 23,514 was collected by the company on Januanry 23, 2012 i.E. Much before the date of renewal of the policy," it held.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 25 2016 | 2:42 PM IST

Next Story