Ex-judges shouldn't take post-retirement jobs if given as 'charity': Justice Kurian Joseph

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 30 2018 | 9:55 PM IST

Former judges should not take up post-retirement jobs if these are given as "charity" by the government, Justice Kurian Joseph said Friday, a day after he retired from the Supreme Court.

Joseph, was part of the January 12 press conference in which now Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Lokur and former judge J Chelameswar had raised serious questions over various issues including allocation of cases in the top court.

He said former judges should take post-retirement assignments only when they are "honourably requested" by the government to man tribunals.

"So long as the government holds the view that it is a charity done to the retired judges, no judge should take it. If a judge is honourably called, requested and appointed and that process is honourably made, there is no harm in it because many of the tribunals are to be manned by judges," Joseph said.

Talking to reporters on his birthday, he said one trouble which the Supreme Court is facing is shortage of good judges, a concern which has also been echoed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi.

Joseph, who had penned a minority verdict against the death penalty on the eve of demitting of his office, favoured abolishment of capital punishment and also cleared his view on it saying, "it is not a personal stand".

When a judge is discharging his duties from the office of judge he is discharging it to the knowledge of his best interest, ability and belief, he said.

"So, as far as death penalty is concerned what I wrote is not my personal philosophies. My personal philosophies should have nothing to do with my judgment. People have taken the spirit of the Bachaan Singh judgment of 1980 forward and said that it should be applied in the rarest of rare cases," the former apex court judge said.

Joseph said there are various advancements made in the views and theories, and questioned as to how it will be assessed that there was no possibility of reformation of the death row convict.

"Is there any system available to us to assess that? This is what I suggested that there should be psychological assessment," he added.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 30 2018 | 9:55 PM IST

Next Story