The move by the Government came after it got the backing of 22 states and union territories.
Minister of State for Home Haribhai Parathibhai Chaudhary while giving this information in the Rajya Sabha today said the Law Commission of India, in its 210th Report, had recommended that Sec 309 (attempt to commit suicide) of IPC needs to be effaced from the statute book.
Chaudhary said since law and order is a state subject, views of all states and union territories were sought on the recommendations of the Law Commission.
Previously, suicide attempts in India were punishable by up to a year in prison or a fine, or both.
According to government data, 134,799 people committed suicide in 2013 compared to 135,445 in the previous year. There was no official data on the number of attempted suicides.
The Law Commission that recommended repealing of Section 309 of IPC in its 210th report in 2008 said that sympathy, counselling and appropriate treatment and not punishment will prevent a person from committing suicide.
The five states which did not fully support the move to delete Section 309 are Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Punjab, Sikkim and Delhi.
Reacting cautiously to the government's move, National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) Chief Justice (rtd) K G Balakrishnan said there are various factors and he will wait for "views from all directions".
"There could be another view. Suicide is for various reasons. We had seen the draft legislation. It was also referred to NHRC. Let us see the reaction. Let us see the views coming from all directions," Balakrishnan said.
To a query whether the NHRC had raised some concerns about the issue, he said that a question was raised in a NHRC conference but added, "Let us see the reactions."
Congress spokesperson and senior lawyer Abhishek Singhvi backed the Centre's move but said it was his "personal view" and his party has not taken a position on the issue.
"I am for it. Personally I support it. Congress has not taken a position on it. This is not something for political parties to decide. This is a sociological debate. I do not think Congress is obliged to take a view on it," Singhvi said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
