Gutka row: DMK seeks 15 days time to reply to panel notice

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Sep 05 2017 | 4:57 PM IST
DMK MLAs including opposition leader M K Stalin today sought 15 days' time to reply to an assembly privileges panel notice against them over bringing banned 'gutka' inside the Tamil Nadu Assembly.
A set of DMK MLAs met a senior official of the state assembly and gave a letter in this regard, Stalin said.
He said they had sought 15 days' time to discuss the matter with legal experts and give a due response.
"We have mentioned (in the letter) that the notice sent by them does not come under the privileges ambit. But we have sought 15 days' time to consult our legal experts in order to draft a due response," Stalin told reporters.
The DMK working president said the K Palaniswami-led state government had "lost majority", in an apparent reference to the revolt of 19 AIADMK MLAs against the chief minister, and questioned its right to serve notices on the opposition MLAs.
"But still we want to perform our democratic duty and therefore, the letter seeking 15 days' time has been given," he said.
The Privileges Committee, headed by Deputy Speaker Pollachi V Jayaraman, had on August 28 issued notice to Stalin and 20 other DMK legislators for having brought gutka (chewable tobacco) nto the House in July.
The panel had sent notices to the DMK MLAs seeking their explanation within a week.
On July 19, DMK MLAs led by Stalin had created a furore in the assembly when they held up gutka sachets, prompting Speaker P Dhanapal to refer their action to the privileges committee.
The Speaker had then said the DMK MLAs' action amounted to "breach of privilege". During a debate that day in the House, Stalin sought to raise the issue of alleged availability of gutka in the state.
The issue of 'gutka' (a mixture of chewing tobacco and betel nut) has created a political furore in Tamil Nadu.
Searches by Income Tax authorities in the premises of a gutka manufacturer here last year had led to unearthing of documents claiming a "payout" to a minister and officials including a senior police officer, as a quid pro quo for overlooking the sale of the banned product.
Ever since the matter came into the limelight, the opposition DMK has been targeting the ruling AIADMK for allegedly allowing gutka sales and the alleged graft involved in it.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 05 2017 | 4:57 PM IST

Next Story