HC acquits man of rape charges on grounds of 'deep love affair'

Image
Press Trust of India Panaji
Last Updated : Apr 04 2018 | 3:35 PM IST

The Panaji bench of the Bombay High Court has acquitted a 27-year-old man of rape charges on the grounds that there was a "deep love affair" between him and the complainant.

The high court was hearing a petition filed by Yogesh Palkar who had challenged his conviction by a lower court.

The lower court had sentenced him to 10 years' imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs 10,000, after pronouncing him guilty under Indian Penal Code section 376 (rape).

The high court judge, Justice C V Bhadang, in his order on February 17, 2018, acquitted Palkar in the case.

A 25-year-old woman had alleged that Palkar, who worked as a chef in an offshore casino, had sexual intercourse with her for the first time in November 2013 at his residence at Bambolim near here, after promising to marry her.

They had intercourse several times after that till December 2013, she had said in her police complaint.

But, in February 2014 he started ignoring her and went back on his promise of marriage as she belonged to a lower caste, the woman charged.

A special court in Panaji then convicted the man on March 31, 2015.

However, during the trial, the woman also filed an affidavit before the special court saying that she could not see Palkar behind bars who was then suffering from depression and undergoing treatment for it.

The woman said, in her affidavit, that she wished to withdraw the complaint due to personal reasons and emotions.

Justice Bhadang, while acquitting the man, said, "It is evident that the woman not only continued the relationship with the appellant (convict) after the first incident (of sexual intercourse), but also went to the extent of withdrawing the complaint by filing an affidavit,due to her personal reasons and emotions.

"This would clearly show that there was a deep love affair between the complainant and the convict. It cannot be said that the consent given by the complainant was on account of any promise of marriage made by the appellant (convict).

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 04 2018 | 3:35 PM IST

Next Story