Justice T S Sivagnanam, allowing the petition filed by a property owner at Melakarur, quashed the sub-registrar's order, dated July 24, 2014, directing the petitioner to pay the deficit stamp duty for the property purchased in 2010.
The judge said the petitioner had purchased the property and registered the sale deed on April 30, 2010.The sub-registrar registered the document and released it.
After four years, the petitioner received a demand notice for Rs 50,279 towards deficit stamp duty.The petitioner said the sub-registrar was not legally authorised to make such a claim.
Besides, no proceedings were initiated under Sec 47-A of Indian Stamp Act which empowered the sub-registrar not to release the sale deed and refer the issue to the collector for determining the stamp duty, the judge said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
