HC allows Sasikala to be quizzed via video-conference

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : May 09 2019 | 10:31 PM IST

The Madras High Court Thursday allowed former AIADMK general secretary V K Sasikala to appear before a court in Egmore for questioning through video conference on May 13.

Justice Anand Venkatesh, disposing of the petition from Sasikala lodged in Bengaluru jail, directed her to appear before the court through video conference in connection with a case filed by the Enforcement Directorate.

The case registered in 1996 relates to the alleged payments made by Sasikala, a close aide of late Tamil Nadu chief minister Jayalalithaa, and co-accused Bhaskaran in violation of FERA for the purchase of a transponder facility and uplinking charges for the now-defunct JJ TV channel.

When the matter came up, senior counsel Raja Rathnam, on behalf of Sasikala, submitted that she was already allowed to appear through video conference.

But, the subsequent presiding officer found some defects in the procedure and directed the appearance of the petitioner in person in the present case, Rathnam said.

Referring to the earlier order of the high court in similar matters, the counsel said it had stated that there is no requirement to produce the petitioner before the court and questioning can be done through video conference.

Counsel for the Enforcement Directorate Hema submitted that the only difficulty is to get signature from the petitioner in the papers after questioning is completed.

To this, Justice Venkatesh said the signatures can be obtained after sending the papers to the jail and it can be witnessed by the officer who will be accompanying the petitioner in the prison at the time of the video conference.

The ED had booked Sasikala in 1996 on the charge of violation of foreign exchange regulations and the case had since been dragging.

A total of four connected cases are pending trial.

In January, the Madras High Court had allowed Sasikala to appear through video-conference for framing of charges, but stipulated that the trial should be completed in four months.

Sasikala is serving her four-year imprisonment awarded in the disproportionate assets case.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 09 2019 | 10:31 PM IST

Next Story