The First Bench,comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice R. Mahadevan, was passing interim orders on a PIL after going through the counter affidavit filed by authorities.
The counter stated that speed breakers were being laid with necessary precautions following specifications as per the Indian Roads Congress 99-1988.
"If one drives even around Chennai, the ground reality may not be as reflected in the affidavit. We, thus, call upon the fifth respondent to carry out a survey of the speed breakers, as an example, in Chennai, and to verify how many of them meet the requirements," the court said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
