A Lucknow division bench of justice Sudhir Agarwal and justice Ravindra Nath Mishra-II passed the order directing the CJM and the SSP to explain as to why action should not be taken against them for committing deliberate and intentional contempt of the court's order.
Also why charges not be framed against them for non compliance of order dated March 1.
It observed "Unless that order is complied with and petitioner purges himself, no defence can be considered of a person who still stands in non compliance of the court's order."
Earlier on March 1, the court had issued bailable warrant against Chairman of UP Jal Nigam, Azam Khan, who is also a cabinet minister, for securing his presence in the court on March 6 in a service related case of an engineer of the Jal Nigam.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
