A Division Bench comprising Justice Krishna Murari and Justice Ram Surat Ram Maurya dismissed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL), filed by one Prakash Chand Srivastava, concurring with the state government's view that a petition was not maintainable in a service matter.
Additional Advocate General Kamal Singh Yadav, who had argued on behalf of the State, told PTI "we cited a number of orders, including one passed by the Supreme Court, to stress the point that a PIL was not maintainable in a service matter. The court had reserved its judgement on June 3 and it dismissed the petition today agreeing with our contention."
The petitioner had also submitted that subsequent to the CBI probe which began following a Delhi High Court order, two charge sheets had been submitted against Ranjan at Mumbai in 2009 and at Delhi in 2010.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
