HC junks PIL seeking probe into killing of 39 Indians in Iraq

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 06 2018 | 3:30 PM IST

The Delhi High Court today dismissed a PIL seeking a detailed investigation into what it called "lapses" of the Centre in saving 39 Indians, who were killed by ISIS in Iraq in 2014, saying such pleas deserve "condemnation" and "need to be discouraged".

A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar said the plea, by a lawyer, reflected "extreme insensitivity" towards the kin of the victims and the suffering they underwent and also does not take into account the steps taken by the central government to save the 39 Indians.

Observing that such pleas deserve "condemnation" and "need to be discouraged", the court imposed a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the petitioner-lawyer, Mehmood Pracha, who was asked to deposit the amount in favour of the advocates welfare fund within four weeks.

Pracha, in his plea, had contended that the Centre was aware long back that the Indians had been killed by the terror outfit after their abduction from Mosul, but had chosen not to disclose it and kept taking the stand that they were alive.

He had claimed that there were glaring anomalies in the statement made by the External Affairs Minister on the floor of Parliament.

He had sought an investigation into the deaths as he wanted to know when and how the Indians were killed.

Advocate Manik Dogra, who had appeared for the Centre and the Intelligence Bureau during the proceedings, had argued that there was no public interest in this petition which should be dismissed with cost.

He had also highlighted the efforts made by the government to rescue the Indians, who were taken hostage at Mosul and said helplines were also set up by the Indian embassy.

The Centre's lawyer had earlier told the court that the government does not say "missing, presumed dead". He had added that "till 100 per cent confirmation of death, we continue to believe they are alive".

Pracha had in 2015 moved the court challenging a look-out circular issued against him to prevent him and his delegation from going to Iraq.

In his PIL, he has claimed that the reason he was stopped from travelling to Iraq was to ensure that his delegation did not find out about the fate of the 39 Indians, whose bodies were recently exhumed from a mass grave in Badosh, a village near Mosul, and brought back.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 06 2018 | 3:30 PM IST

Next Story