HC orders promotion of 15 cops as Head Constables

Image
Press Trust of India Madurai
Last Updated : Aug 26 2014 | 8:50 PM IST
The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court has directed promotion of 15 Grade I police constables here as Head Constables with effect from April 18, 2007 and all monetary and other attendant benefits for them from then within eight weeks.
Justice R.Mahadevan quashed the Promotion Panel prepared by the City Police Commissioner on April 18, 2007 and asked him to prepare a fresh panel accommodating the 15 constables who lost their regular seniority and consequential promotion due to delay on his part in preparing the panel.
The petitioners said they were appointed as Grade II Constables in Tamil Nadu Police Service and transferred to the City Armed Reserve police. In 2003-04, though vacancies arose for Grade-I constable post, the Commissioner did not draw a panel eligible for promotion and hence they lost the chance.
In the meanwhile, twenty constables, junior to petitioners, were promoted as Grade-I constable next year under accelerated promotion scheme for those who participated in the team to eliminate forest brigand Veerappan. They were given their second promotion to the post of Head Constable in April 2007.
Their second promotions were reverted, following a Government Order which said "At any stage, the accelerated Promotion will not give the individual accelerated consequential seniority since accelerated promotion is only for one stage." However, the 20 were given promotion later.
The petitioners were promoted as Head Constables on April 4, 2010, but the same was not given retrospective effect from April 18, 2007 when the accelerated promotees were given their second promotion, and hence the present writ petition.
Allowing the petitions of the constables, the Judge said the Commissioner failed to draw a panel for promotion from Grade II to Grade I constable during 2003-04. Had it been done in 2003-04, the petitioners would have got seniority and become eligible for Head Constable elevation.
The Judge said the right to be considered for promotion was a fundamental right and if the list had been prepared in time, the petitioners' names would have been considered.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 26 2014 | 8:50 PM IST

Next Story