A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar expressed serious concern over Delhi Metro and Delhi University's failure to run awareness programmes on the consequences of defacing public and private properties and termed the ineptness of the authorities as "appalling".
The court's oral observations came on advocate Prashant Manchanda's plea seeking a complete ban on alleged defacement of public properties by the candidates for the DUSU polls.
During the hearing, the bench enquired from authorities, the metro and the varsity about the ground work they have carried out to clear the mess across Delhi.
None of them provided answers to the satisfaction of the court, drawing strong criticism from the bench.
The bench chided the university for a complete lack of coordination with the civic agencies.
"It is clear that no steps have been taken to clean the defacement, disseminate public awareness and the formulation of guidelines to deal with the menace of defacement.
It remarked: "Is it a 10 year programme? Do you want us to assign it to the high court's registrar office?" and directed the city government to take urgent steps to formulate the guidelines.
It came down heavily on the Delhi Metro for miserably failing to take even basic steps or roll out a plan on public awareness campaign and observed that the metro was not concerned about its own property.
The court then sternly enquired from the authorities, asking "do you want us to now frame the guidelines monitor the entire thing."
It directed the authorities to place on record a comprehensive action plan with time line and launch a widespread cleaning awareness campaign. It also ordered all the parties to convene a meeting on December 15 on the issue.
The bench constituted a committee comprising advocate Manchanda and advocate Aman Panwar, who was appearing for DUSU president Rocky Tuseed, as a member to frame a draft for the guidelines to deal with the issue of defacement.
"Animation films and jingles should be played in Delhi Metro and other places," the bench said, while directing the Delhi government to pursue the matter seriously and set out a comprehensive action plan.
The court then listed the matter for further hearing on December 22.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
