Disposing of a clutch of petitions by one B Rasappan and 11 others, who sought quashing of the orders of the District Manager of TASMAC in Nagapattinam, Justice D Hariparanthaman sent the matter back to the latter for reconsideration.
The petitioners were initially appointed as assistant salesmen in 2004 and promoted to the post of salesman in 2005.
But on July 26, 2013, the TASMAC District Manager at Nagapattinam passed an order to once again re-designate them as assistant salesmen.
He also observed that no adverse orders resulting in civil consequences could be passed against a person without hearing him. He then asked the TASMAC District Manager to hear the petitioners.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
