HC quashes suspension of Forest Range Officer

Image
Press Trust of India Madurai
Last Updated : May 15 2014 | 9:07 PM IST
: Madras High Court Bench today quashed suspension of a Forest Range Officer, allegedly for taking action against private land owners who indiscriminately felled trees on forest land, saying "it is the duty of the respondent to protect honest officers."
Allowing an appeal by the officer P Jabez, Justices V Ramasubramanian and V M Velumani noted there are disturbing facts in the case, including of the suspension order being given on the premise that an enquiry into grave charges was contemplated.
The judges noted that though five months had elapsed after the suspension order was issued, the Chief Conservator of Forest and Field director director of Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger reserve had not issued any memo containing grave charges and warranting major pentalty proceedings.
The appellant claimed he was being victimised as he had acted against the land owners who indiscriminately felled trees and also reported it to the media.
The bench said serious charges had been levelled against the appellant before the single judge to keep him at bay. The single judge should not have dismissed the petition without even calling on officials to file the counter.
The judges noted that the respondent had filed their counter only in this appeal court. Before the single Judge they merely levelled serious charges of irregularities against the appellant
In the counter they had given some information, supporting the appellant's claim on felling of trees. The official had admitted that the Chief Conservator of Forests was transferred. The counter was wishy-washy on the charge against private land owners who cut trees.
The files showed that only after the court took up the case had the officials mooted plans to issue charge memo. It showed that one S Ramesh of Swasam Trust,an NGO, had given the complaint against the appellant in Nov 2013, based on which the chief conservator of forests was transferred .
Quoting an apex court judgement the judges said "It is most unfortunate that the Government demoralises the officers who discharge their duties honestly and diligently.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 15 2014 | 9:07 PM IST

Next Story