Petitioner Sanjay Lakhe Patil and Sanjay Chitnis had requested the court to restrain the BJP government from taking any decision until the PIL was decided.
However, the division bench headed by Chief Justice Mohit Shah said at this juncture it would not be possible to grant any interim relief. The court posted the PIL for hearing along with two other petitions on the same issue on November 28.
The other two PILs have been filed by Ketan Tirodkar and Rajkumar Awasti.
The present PIL says that the BJP government needed support of 145 MLAs to win the confidence motion in the 288-member Assembly (current strength is 287), and as it did not have the number it resorted to voice vote.
Under the constitution, the respondents (the Speaker and the CM) were duty-bound to hold a secret ballot or head count to establish majority in the house, it contends.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
