Justice Ajay Gadkari asked him to surrender before police on or before May 23 while allowing Rane to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition.
"I am of the view that this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail," the Judge ruled after perusing a police reply opposing Rane's plea for liberty and also while going through the FIR lodged against him.
When the court said it was not inclined to grant Rane pre-arrest bail and was about to dismiss his petition, his lawyer Rajendra Shirodkar sought to withdraw the plea with a rider that Rane would surrender to police.
The court allowed him to withdraw the petition and asked him to surrender within a week.
The judge gave his ruling after hearing public prosecutor Arfan Sait and Rane's counsel Shirodkar on granting pre-arrest bail to Rane.
A sessions court had earlier rejected Rane's plea for pre-arrest bail. Aggrieved, Rane moved the high court with a plea for anticipatory bail.
According to the FIR, Nilesh Rane and his accomplices had allegedly kidnapped Sawant and assaulted him on way to Mumbai for not attending a rally called by Rane at Chiplun in Ratnagiri district to demand reservation for the Maratha community.
Sawant was allegedly confined to a house at Andheri in Mumbai and later let-off, the complaint alleged.
police had registered a case against Rane and his accomplices.
Soon after the incident, Sawant was hospitalised and Narayan Rane had visited him to pacify and urge him to withdraw the complaint against Nilesh Rane but Sawant declared his resolve to fight the case.
Rane's lawyer Rajendra Shirodkar argued that the charges levelled against the Congress leader were not very serious and attracted punishment upto seven years, if proved against him. He also denied the charges of kidnapping and assault saying the allegations against Rane were baseless.
The allegation that the accused was assaulted with hockey sticks was also not true because no injury marks were found on his person when he was hospitalised, Shirodkar said.
Rane's lawyer, on the other hand, argued that custodial interrogation was not needed as there was nothing to recover from him and the probe was almost over. He said Rane was willing to cooperate with police if he was granted pre-arrest bail.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
