A division bench of Justices Jayant Patel and G B Shah yesterday refused to grant relief to the hotel group against the state forest department's notice about sealing of the resort which does not have a no-objection-certificate.
The company has moved the court against the notice which says that it should close down the resort by April 15.
Further hearing would be held on April 23.
The High Court took up the issue as a public interest litigation upon the representation of Anil Chudasama who alleged that the local authorities prevented him from carrying out farming on a plot of land purchased by him.
He also alleged that hotels and resorts were operating in the area without any permissions and the land around the sanctuary was being sold, which is prohibited.
The government closed 55 commercial establishments in the area subsequently.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
