A division bench of the court here, comprising Justices Umanath Singh and Mahendra Dayal, passed the order on a special appeal filed on behalf of Srivastava by the UP government challenging yesterday's order by a single judge initiating the contempt proceedings.
On behalf of the state government, Additional Advocate General Zafaryab Jilani pleaded that the proceedings may be stayed against the official as prima facie case of contempt of the court's order was not made out.
The court had yesterday framed contempt charges against Srivastava for not providing security to Upadhyay.
Upadhyay's counsel had submitted that on March 30, 2012, a division bench had directed the state government to consider providing 'Z' category security to his client but the order of the court was not complied with and that came under the purview of contempt of court.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
