Division bench of Justices A S Oka and M S Sonak, while restraining the Authority from giving further permissions, observed that the constitution of the authority seemed illegal.
The court passed the order on a public interest litigation filed by Thane resident Rohan Joshi.
The PIL said that members of the tree authority did not possess adequate expertise and qualifications.
Only three members of the Authority were graduates in science, botany or agriculture while others were not enough educated and were appointed to the authority only because of political patronage, it said.
The court adjourned the hearing to January 2018, asking all the members of the Tree Authority to file personal affidavits-in-reply to the PIL.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
