A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar asked the medical superintendent (MS) of Safdarjung Hospital, which is under the central government, to file a report on the number of doctors who had attended to patients, department-wise, on two Mondays for this month.
On the issue of rise in violent attacks on doctors, the court asked the MS to file a separate report on the measures in place to protect the doctors and the paramedical staff.
"The affidavit filed by the Centre is hopelessly insufficient and does not give us a correct picture. We have repeatedly asked the position on availability of doctors in hospitals maintained by them," the bench said.
It expressed unhappiness over the issue that the central government's counsel was not aware of the number of doctors registered with the Medical Council of India (MCI).
"You do not know how many doctors are registered with the MCI. You are only giving statistics to pull the wool over our eyes," it remarked.
The court had on May 3 last year initiated the PIL based on the report that doctors in public hospitals were being subjected to extreme violence.
During the hearing, the court said it was concerned as to how many doctors were there in a particular field and not the total number of doctors, as informed by the Centre.
It said that since July 2017, it was asking the Centre to give the number of doctors working in its hospitals and sought to know the patients/doctors ratio as well as the patients/ other personnel ratio in the government hospitals here.
The court also observed, "we want to know why doctors are running from this country" and asked the Centre if it was concerned why doctors were being beaten up.
Digpaul replied in affirmative and said "we are also concerned".
The bench had earlier also expressed dissatisfaction with the Centre's report that the number of doctors in its hospitals had seen a massive increase in the past 5 years, and asked when was the last recruitment done.
Stressing the need to provide security and better facilities to doctors and patients, the bench had asked the authorities about the number of cases they had lodged in this regard and also the prosecution carried out.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
