A division bench comprising Chief Justice A M Khanwilkar and Justice R B Misra said it is not a case of taking away exemption retrospectively but it would be a matter of re-determination of the total holding of the person concerned as on the appointed day.
Kangra Valley Small Tea Planters Association and others had challenged the provisions on the ground that Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Act exempts tea estates from application of the Act.
The court observed that the purport of the provision is not only of withdrawal of exemption given to land used as tea estate, but also withdrawal of concession given to the land owner at the time by excluding it from his total holding for determining the permissible ceiling area.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
