HC upholds punishment of 3 men for scuffle over 'beedi' price

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 08 2018 | 4:40 PM IST

Three men, convicted for grievously injuring the father of a vendor for charging 50 paise extra for a bundle of 'beedi', leading to his death two decades ago, have got respite from the Delhi High Court, which has refused to interfere with their three-and-a-half-year jail term.

On March 28, 1998, the three men went to purchase a bundle of 'beedi' from the vendor, who demanded Rs 3 for it, while the accused claimed it cost Rs 2.50. This was followed by a verbal altercation that turned into a scuffle.

Being assaulted by the men, the vendor raised an alarm, asking his father to save him. The accused beat up his father with sticks and the man died three days later, on March 31, 1998. Simple injuries were caused to his son.

The three men were sentenced to three-and-a-half years in jail by a trial court in 2001 for grievously injuring the victim and the police moved the Delhi High Court in 2003, seeking to hold them guilty for the offence of murder.

A bench of justices S Muralidhar and Vinod Goel recently dismissed the appeal and refused to interfere with the trial court's order, convicting and sentencing the three men for the milder offence, saying this court was unable to be persuaded to hold that the trial court had committed any grave illegality in coming to the conclusion.

"It may have been debatable, given the blunt force injuries on the head of the deceased, that the offence could be one punishable under section 304 Part II, IPC.

"However, at this distance in time i.e. more than 20 years after the incident and particularly given that by the time the trial concluded and the order on sentence was passed the three accused had already undergone more than three-and-a-half years of imprisonment and were in fact sentenced for the offence punishable under section 326 IPC to the period already undergone, the court is not inclined to interfere with either the conviction or the sentence awarded by the trial court," the bench said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 08 2018 | 4:40 PM IST

Next Story