Researchers found that nine-month-old infants can engage in reasoning about whether the people they observe are friends based on the person's likes and dislikes.
"This is some of the first evidence that young infants are tracking other people's social relationships," said Amanda L Woodward, from the University of Chicago and co-author of the study.
In the study, 64 nine-month-old infants were randomised into groups and then watched videos showing two adults.
"We depicted evaluations of food because food may provide particularly salient social information," said co-author Katherine D Kinzler.
"Eating with family and friends is inherently social, and so infants might be particularly inclined to use eating behaviours to make inferences about social relationships," Kinzler said.
To investigate whether infants linked food reactions to social relationships, the experiment examined how infants responded to subsequent videos, which showed the same adults acting either positively or negatively toward each other.
In the other video, adults turned away from each other, crossed their arms and said 'Hmp' in an unfriendly tone.
The research team assessed the infants' reactions to the videos by measuring the amount of time the babies focused on a still screen at the end of each video.
"When babies see something unexpected, they look longer. It's out of place for them, and they have to make sense of it," Woodward said.
The infants' responses to the videos suggested that they were surprised when adults who liked the same foods behaved negatively toward each other. They also were surprised when adults who disagreed about the foods behaved like friends.
Infants in the study predicted that people who reacted similarly to the two foods were likely to be friends and were taken off-guard when the videos showed something different.
The findings provide the first evidence that the roots of a critical aspect of social cognition, reasoning about other people's social interactions based on those people's likes and dislikes, can be traced to infancy, according to the authors.
The study was published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
