A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice M M Kumar and Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey directed the state government to file a reply before October 13, the next date of hearing.
The notice was accepted by Additional Advocate General Reyaz Ahmad on behalf of the state government.
"Reply is to be filed by or before adjourned date," the court directed. The PIL, filed by advocate Azhar-ul-Amin, maintained that officers responsible for acts of omission and commission deserved to be punished appropriately.
It claimed that the measures required to be followed in accordance with flood manual were not taken and "the acts of omission and commission of the state government ranging from criminal negligence to direct acts of interference with flood protection measures, structural and non-structural has caused inundation of most parts of the capital city of Srinagar".
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
