The Returning Officer on December 31 last year filed a complaint to the Judicial Magistrate against Karunanidhi, alleging that he had not furnished particulars about certain properties at the time of filing his nomination papers for the April 13, 2011 Assembly polls.
The Judicial Magistrate, who has taken cognizance of the complaint, had issued summons to Karunanidhi on January 3 this year asking him to appear before the court on March 7.
He submitted that nomination papers can not be rejected even if there was any failure or suppression in disclosure of any asset of a candidate as per the direction of ECI.
The affidavit which has to be filed at the time of submission of nomination paper as per Section 33-A of Representation of People Act only requires candidates to furnish information regarding criminal cases pending against them and does not require informations relating to assets of the candidate, Karunanidhi contended.
He contended that the Returning Officer had filed this complaint in contravention of the above circular sent by ECI.
Election officers were deemed to be on deputation to the Election Commission for a period commencing on and from the date of notification calling for election and ending with the date of declaration of the results. The status of the officer ends on the date of declaration of the results, he contended.
The officer can not file a complaint now calling himself as a Returning Officer as the declaration of results was over by May 13, 2011, and he has no locus standi to file complaint against him, Karunanidhi contended.
