Kerala govt supporting extremists in Hadiya's case: Ashokan

Image
Press Trust of India Kochi
Last Updated : Jan 23 2018 | 5:20 PM IST
K M Ashokan, father of Hadiya who is at the centre of an alleged love jihad case, today accused the Left-led Kerala government of supporting extremists in the matter.
Hadiya had converted to Islam and married a Muslim man, much against her parents' wish.
"There is nothing more to say about their (state government) stand on this issue. People are very well aware of it," Ashokan told Malayalam news channels.
"The state government is always having a mentality to support the extremists. That was visible from the very beginning in this case," he said.
He alleged that even the Kerala Women's Commission took a stand against him and his family in the matter.
Asokan, however, did not react to the Supreme Court's directive to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) today that it could continue with its probe into the alleged love jihad aspect, but cannot investigate the marital status of the man and the woman.
The father had alleged that his daughter Akhila's marriage to a Muslim man was a case of "forced conversion". The girl had taken the name Hadiya after converting to Islam.
In May, the Kerala High Court had annulled Hadiya's marriage and ordered her to return to live with her parents in Kottayam district of Kerala.
In an interim order on a petition by her husband Shafin Jahan challenging the verdict, the Supreme Court on November 27 set her free from the custody of her parents and directed her to continue her studies at the Salem college, appointing its dean as her guardian.
A Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra today said, "You (NIA) can investigate it (the alleged love jihad case) but you cannot investigate about their marital status".
The top court also said that Hadiya, alleged to be a victim of love jihad, had appeared before it and specifically said that she married Jahan on her own.
The bench also observed that it would examine whether the Kerala High Court was correct in annulling the marriage while hearing a habeas corpus petition.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 23 2018 | 5:20 PM IST

Next Story