Killers of Rajiv Gandhi cannot seek 'rays of hope': SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 02 2015 | 10:42 PM IST
The Supreme Court today rejected contention of the convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case seeking "rays of hope", observing that such concept was much for the victims and their dependents who have to suffer the aftermath of the incident without any solace.
"... It must be stated that such ray of hope was much more for the victims who were done to death and whose dependents were to suffer the aftermath with no solace left," the five- judge constitutional bench headed by Chief Justice H L Dattu said.
"Therefore, when the dreams of such victims in whatever manner and extent it was planned, with reference to oneself, his or her dependents and everyone surrounding him was demolished in an unmindful and in some cases in a diabolic manner in total violation of the Rule of Law which is prevailing in an organised society, they (convicts) cannot be heard to say only their rays of hope should prevail and kept intact," the bench said.
It also said there was no scope for concept of ray of hope for such hardened criminals as any favour will only result in "misplaced sympathy".
"Therefore, we find no scope to apply the concept of ray of hope to come for the rescue of such hardened, heartless offenders, which if considered in their favour will only result in misplaced sympathy and again will be not in the interest of the society. Therefore, we reject the said argument outright," the bench said.
The bench, while delivering the judgement on Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, also took a strong note of those who "indulge in propagation of rescuing the convicts".
It said that "all the hope of the entire people of this country was shattered by a planned murder" of Rajiv Gandhi, "in whom people of this country reposed great faith and confidence when he was entrusted with such great responsible office in the fond hope that he will do his best to develop this country in all trusts".
Taking a note of the people seeking leniency for convicts, the bench said, "Even those who propagate for lessening the gravity of imposition of severe punishment are unmindful of such consequences and are only keen to indulge in propagation of rescuing the convicts from being meted out with appropriate punishments."
"We are at a loss to understand as to for what reason or purpose such propagation is carried on and what benefit the society at large is going to derive," it said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 02 2015 | 10:42 PM IST

Next Story