Lawyers protest: AIBA urges BCI to take suo motu action

Image
Press Trust of India
Last Updated : Sep 19 2015 | 9:42 PM IST
All India Bar Association (AIBA) has urged Bar Council of India (BCI) to take suo motu action and suspend the licences of lawyers who staged a protest before the Madras High Court Chief Justice's bench demanding Tamil be made official language.
Charging Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry with failure to take action against the errant lawyers, AIBA Chairman Dr Adish C Aggarwala said that "by now, the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu should have identified the persons leading the illegal agitations and acted against them. The Council's failure could lead to more serious threats to judicial independence."
"Therefore, AIBA demands BCI, New Delhi, to take suo motu note of the developments in Tamil Nadu and immediately debar the advocates who had unleashed threat and intimidation to the institution", he said in a statement here.
On September 14, a group of advocates had created a flutter in the High Court when they sat in the court hall throwing black cloth across their mouth demanding Tamil be made the court language, earning Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul's displeasure.
The advocates, numbering around 12 and under the banner of Tamils Struggle Movement of Madurai, entered the court of the Chief Justice and occupied the seats in the public gallery before arrival of the Judge.
As the CJ arrived, two of the lawyers, wearing robes, moved to the seats meant for advocates. Immediately after taking his seat, the Chief Justice noticed the presence of the protesting lawyers and sought to know the reason.
Showing his displeasure at the protest, Justice Kaul had said the court was not the right forum for making such demands and that they should approach the government.
The Judge said despite intimation of possibility of such protest, the local police force had not been able to prevent the situation.
However, the lawyers in the post-lunch session removed the black cloth but remained seated in the court.
Additional Solicitor General G Rajagopalan, who was present, submitted that it had become routine for a section of lawyers to protest like this.
He also said police did not want to go beyond a point in view of past untoward incidents, including the violent clashes between lawyers and police in February 2009.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 19 2015 | 9:42 PM IST

Next Story