It also directed the government to place the necessary information in this regard before the court.
The apex court said though the government was saying that it was not averse to electoral reforms, it has not placed the necessary details. Even the information furnished before it in an affidavit by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) was "not complete", it added.
"The government is saying they are not averse to some reform. Necessary information should be there on record (in the court)," it said and asked the government to file a detailed affidavit before it in this regard by September 12.
The top court was hearing a plea disclosure of sources of income by the candidates contesting elections when they file nomination for elections.
The arguments remained inconclusive and will continue tomorrow.
"The Union of India is having Swachh Bharat (Abhiyan) which will also cover this field. It is not about cleaning of garbage only," the counsel said, adding "the intention of the Government of India is in the right direction".
When the counsel referred to the affidavit filed by the CBDT on the issue raised by the petitioner about an alleged jump of up to 500 per cent in politicians assets which they have declared in the nomination paper, the bench said the information given in it was not complete.
"You better file a detailed affidavit. This affidavit which you have filed is nothing but typed papers. Do not make vague statements. If the CBDT has taken some action, please disclose what action has been taken," the bench said.
The top court also said the government could also furnish the information in a sealed cover before it.
"If you want that certain information cannot be disclosed to public, you can file it in a sealed cover with reasons why you do not want it to be made public. But please disclose it to the court," the bench said.
The apex court had earlier issued notices to the Centre and the Election Commission on the plea by NGO Lok Prahari seeking inclusion of a column in the nomination form seeking details of the sources of income.
The plea has claimed that the candidates while filing their nomination papers were disclosing their assets, assets of their spouse, children and other dependents, but they do not reveal the sources of income.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
