Number of bank accounts of Jaya, Sasikala mushroomed: SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 14 2017 | 8:22 PM IST
Mushrooming of 50 bank accounts of late J Jayalalithaa and V K Sasikala between 1991 and 1995 was to utilise the transfer of their huge unaccounted money, the Supreme Court said today, giving credence to the trial court findings.
The apex court, which convicted Sasikala and two of her relatives in the disproportionate assets case, referred to the trial court findings and said it had "held the view that the respondents in the case in hand had failed to offer any satisfactory explanation with regard to the enormous unexplained credit/accumulations in their bank accounts".
A bench of Justices P C Ghose and Amitava Roy said in its judgement that trial court had noted that at the commencement of the check period, there were "hardly 10 to 12 bank accounts standing in the names of Jayalalithaa and Sasikala, but thereafter 50 accounts mushroomed during the check period".
It said that deposits and withdrawals represented through different entries in the accounts suggest multiplication of transactions "stemming from the same corpus".
"The maze of financial exchanges in fragments involving different combinations, hint at the attempt to inflate individual and collective income of the respondents. The banking transactions, though resorted to for proclaiming genuineness thereof, having regard to the overall factual conspectus, do not appear to be real," the bench said.
It noted that about 50 banks accounts were opened in the names of accused persons and the companies.
"According to the Trial Court, the overall evidence as considered by it disclosed that the business activities in the names of Sasikala and her two relatives started only during the check period and that they did not invest any funds on their own for that purpose and in fact utilised these as a front to enable Jayalalithaa and Sasikala transfer huge unaccounted money through the bank accounts thereof," it said.
The apex court also referred to the findings of the trial court, which had said that the evidence on record "cumulatively substantiated that the returns, the balance sheet and the profit and loss accounts were framed and fashioned to offer an explanation to the otherwise titanic unexplained credits in their respective bank accounts".

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 14 2017 | 8:22 PM IST

Next Story