A Pakistani court on Thursday sought a reply from the federal government and the National Accountability Bureau by Friday on a petition of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif challenging the condition of furnishing indemnity bond for the removal of his name from the no-fly list so that he could travel to the UK for his medical treatment.
Sharif on Thursday filed a petition in the Lahore High Court seeking an order for the Imran Khan government to remove his name from the no-fly list or the Exit Control List (ECL).
A two-member bench of the court headed by Justice Baqir Najfi sought para-wise comments from the Imran Khan government and the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) by Friday and adjourned the hearing till then.
On Wednesday the government granted one-time permission to Sharif for travel abroad for four weeks against submission of Rs 700 crore indemnity bonds.
The three-time prime minister and his PML-N party have refused to meet federal government's demand to submit indemnity bond worth Rs 700 crore for travel to the UK for treatment, saying it was "illegal" and denounced attempts to politicise his health.
Sharif, 69, is suffering from multiple health complications, including erratic platelet count, and is currently being treated at his residence near Lahore where an ICU has been set up.
"Nawaz Sharif's condition is very critical and he has to go abroad (London) for diagnosis and treatment of his disease," Shehbaz Sharif, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) president and the younger brother of Sharif, said, adding Prime Minister Khan is doing 'dirty politics' on the health of Sharif.
If this delay caused any harm to Sharif's health then Khan will be responsible for this, he said.
Shehbaz said Sharif had returned in July 2018 to the country to face jail. "Why any guarantee is needed to allow him to leave the country. This condition of 'political ransom' is not acceptable to us," he clarified.
He said: "The government's offer (to remove Sharif's name from the no-fly or the Exit Control List (ECL) is the worst example of the government's vendetta against the Sharif family. The government's conditional offer is unlawful, unconstitutional and is only a manifestation of Khan's vengeful and prejudicial mindset."
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
