Pending arbitration no ground for withholding info: CIC

Pendency of an arbitration proceeding or a litigation cannot be a reason to deny information to an RTI applicant by any government department, the Central Information Commission has ruled.
"The mere pendency of arbitration proceedings is not sufficient justification by itself for withholding the information. The RTI Act provides no exemption from disclosure requirement for sub-judice matters.
"The only exemption in sub-judice matters is regarding what has been expressly forbidden by a court or a tribunal and what may constitute contempt of court," Information Commissioner Basant Seth said in his order.
The case relates to an RTI petitioner who sought from MTNL, through 34 different applications, details of expenditure which are being inquired into by the authorities.

The Information officer refused to disclose the information citing section 8(1)(h) of the RTI.
The section prohibits disclosure of information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders.
The officer said the appellant is a contractor who has been black-listed by the department in 2007 and various disputes regarding his payments are presently before an arbitrator and hence the information sought by him is exempt under Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act.
However, Seth said the information requested by the petitioner cannot be denied on this ground, saying, "...The denial of information under Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act cannot be sustained...The CPIO should allow the appellant to inspect the relevant records relating to his aforesaid 34 RTI applications within 45 days from the date of receipt of this order.