Plea for designated courts to deal with unregulated deposit schemes: HC seeks Delhi govt stand

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 01 2020 | 1:20 PM IST

The Delhi High Court has sought the response of the AAP government on a plea for setting up designated courts to deal with violation of a law banning unregulated deposit schemes like ponzi scams.

A bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice C Hari Shankar issued notice to the Delhi government seeking its stand by May 22 on the petition which also seeks appointment of a competent authority as provided under the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019.

The plea by Abhijit Mishra, a financial economist, also seeks formulation of rules for the implementation of the Act.

Mishra, in his petition filed through advocates Payal Bahl and Ameet Singh, has said though the law came into effect from February last year, the Delhi government is yet to appoint a competent authority or set up designated courts as provided for under the Act.

No rules have also been framed for implementation of the Act, the plea has claimed.

It has contended that Mishra had made several representations to the authorities concerned, including the government and the Delhi High Court, to appoint a competent authority and set up designated courts.

However, no action was taken and therefore, he filed the instant petition, Mishra has said.

He has further contended that under section 7 of the Act, "Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi has to appoint officers who are at the rank of Secretary to the statutory position of the competent authority".

The petition has also claimed that under section 8 of the Act, the Delhi government has to seek concurrence of the high court for setting up the designated courts which are to be presided over by a judge "not below the rank of District and Sessions Judge or an Additional District and Sessions Judge".

Mishra has contended that in the absence of rules for implementation of the Act, police officers don't know the procedure to be followed for prosecution of violations of this law.

"By virtue of the information received by the petitioner (Mishra) under the Right to Information Act from the High Court of Delhi, the Delhi government has not made any efforts towards appointment of a competent authority, constitution of designated courts and formulation of rules..," the petition has claimed.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 01 2020 | 1:20 PM IST

Next Story