Poem on Mahatma: SC refuses to quash charge against editor

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 14 2015 | 12:22 PM IST
The Supreme Court today dismissed the plea of a bank employee who had challenged framing of charges against him for publishing an alleged "vulgar and obscene" poem on Mahatma Gandhi in 1994 in an in-house magazine of which he was an editor.
A bench comprising justices Dipak Misra and Prafulla C Pant said one cannot be allowed to use indecent language for "historically respected personalities like Mahatma Gandhi".
The bench upheld the Bombay High Court's decision of not quashing charge of sale/publication of obscene books, framed against accused Devidas Ramchandra Tuljapurkar, saying freedom of speech and expression does not allow a person to cross "contemporaneous community parameters" on decency.
The bench asked Tuljapurkar, the then editor of in-house magazine of Bank of Maharashtra Employees Union, to express his point of view before the lower court during the trial.
The court, however, quashed the criminal proceedings against the printers and publishers of the magazine in which the poem penned by Marathi poet Vasant Dattatraya Gurjar was published, saying they have already tendered an unconditional apology.
On April 16, the apex court had reserved its verdict on the plea of Tuljapurkar, who was made an accused in 1994 for publishing the allegedly vulgar poem on Gandhi, for quashing of his prosecution under section 292 (sale, publication of obscene books) under the IPC.
The court had said it would decide as to whether putting "indecent words" in the "mouth of Mahatma Gandhi" by the poet falls under ambit of freedom of speech and expression or not.
"The issue of linguistic freedom qua Mahatma Gandhi is bothering us. It is a question of statutory or constitutional comfort," the bench had said.
Referring to the poem 'Gandhi Mala Bhetala Hota', written by Gurjar in 1984, Tuljapurkars's lawyer had submitted that people, who know Marathi, say that the poem is "satirical".
The accused had approached the apex court against the Bombay High Court order dismissing his plea seeking quashing of his prosecution.
For a first-time offender, the penal provision prescribes maximum two years of jail term and a fine of Rs 2,000.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 14 2015 | 12:22 PM IST

Next Story